Judge Kollar Reigns SUpreme

On Wednesday, April 25, 2001, Judge Charles J. Kollar, of North Brunswick Municipal Court, was confronted with a renewing of get vehicle related teddys. From reckless campaign to tearaway(a) without a registration and everything in between, some of the cases I listened to argon summarized below.         In the world-class case, a woman had stomach trouble and her save was thrust her to the drug store. On the way, they were stuck behind a driver going too abately and followed the driver too closely. They primitively pleaded guilty, but this was later retracted and replaced with a guilty plea. They drivers avocation too closely were supercharged $100 plus $30 apostrophize costs. I speak out the o.k. is rather zoom for a silly offense and the driver going tedious and causing this should have also been ticketed.         The second case I viewed had multiple first-rates. The driver pleaded guilty and received a $50 fine for insecure driving, a $300 fine for driving without restitution, a $30 fine for driving without a get and $60 in judgeship costs. The driver was never convicted of a driving offense before so Judge Kollar admitted to existence more lenient with him then he would have been with a nonher(prenominal) driver. In addition to the fines, Kollar hang up the drivers permission for one year. I recall the fines were beauteous and the driver got what he deserved, but I think that the license suspension was a lot for a offshoot time offense, however not knowing the megabucks of the unsafe driving, it may not have been a transmit judgment.         The third case involved a woman who did not put up her seatbelt and had a licensing charge against her. She pleaded guilty to both, and was charged $80 plus $60 hook costs. I think its a fair verdict. Over half of the penalty fines were because of her blow to wear a seatbelt, which put her life in danger, and its apparent that she wont swallow to wear it again afte! r this.         Another case I viewed involved a man driving below a revoked license. For this, he was charged $500 and $30 court costs. It was the drivers first offense and he pleaded guilty, so Kollar again agree to be more lenient. He suspended the drivers license for 10 eld and said that if he were stopped again, he would be in jail for 10 days.

I think this was a fair judgment because driving under a suspended license is just ignorant and I think that ignorance deserves to be punished. evaluator was served.         The last case I viewed had a replicate charge. The first was s peeding, which was lowered to unsafe driving, at a $cl fine and $30 court costs. The woman also was unavailing to put in her insurance card, which became a $30 fine and $30 court costs. By putting others at hazard by speeding, I think the woman deserved to be fined as untold as she was. Also, not being open to produce insurance merits punishment.         Many of the other cases I power saw involved the same(p) elements as the ones above, most specifically operating without a license, unsafe driving and lack of registration/insurance cards. I think that most of the punishments were fair, as the drivers knew the consequences of what they were doing before they did it. If nothing else, at least they learned from their mistakes and hopefully wont be in court again. If you motive to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essa y, visit our page: write my paper