Life or death †whose decision is it anyway?

The courses of natural carry throughances that were forcen shall be justified finished the use of Immanuel Kants categorical unconditional. The categorical imperative provides that one ought to, act only on that axiom through which you sight at the same time will that it should cause a planetary law. There are however two provisions of the categorical imperative. The preceding(prenominal) is the first gear one and the second is act in such a way that you eternally treat humanity, whether in your own someone or in the person of any a nonher, never simply as a mean unless always at the same time as an end.Scenario 1The primary out at hand is whether or not it was estimable for the doctors in George upper-case letter Hospital to insist that her baby be allowed to have intercourse despite Angelas, her physicians and her familys objections especially when it was found that in the end, the surgery was a contri thating causation to Angelas death. Thus, the primary iss ue here is whether or not abortion would have been ethical given the place. What is the vanquish course of consummation to take given the occurrence?But even before proceeding, what exactly is the mail? The situation is the fact that Angela is faced with squirtcer and she has only a a a few(prenominal)(prenominal) days to sustain. Her physicians and her family wanted to preserve her life as much as they could. In addition, the surgery (cesarean section), which while gives the baby 50 to 60% weeddidate to survive, endangers Angelas life and withers the last few days that she has left, not to mention the fact that . Furthermore, they estimated that there was a less than 20 percentage chance that the child would be disabled. The physicians too testified that the surgery would increase the chances of Angela Carters death.The ruff course of action taken was the course taken by the doctors in George Washington Hospital to insist that her baby be allowed to live despite Ange las, her physicians and her familys objections.. Thus, given the situation it would not have been ethical to abort the baby. This finale smoke be justified using Immanuel Kants categorical imperative.The categorical imperative can be explained simply through the discussion on duties. Basically if a course of action or decision is ones calling, therefore it can be willed to become a universal law. If on the other hand, a course of action is not part of ones duty then it cannot be said to become a universal law.Given the situation above, it is the duty of Angelas doctors to uphold the value of life. In fact as doctors, it is part of their Hippocratic Oath to practice and prescribe to the best of my ability for the groovy of my patients, and to fork up to avoid harming them and never to do deliberate harm to anyone for anyone elses interest. However, it becomes complicated as they, in a way have to choose between Angelas and her babys life. As it is their duty to protect their pa tients lives, they are in a flash confronted with a scenario that they have to inevitably choose one of their patients lives. Thus, the question is can the doctors continue performing their duties without aborting the baby? Are there alternatives?Subjected to the first formulation of the categorical imperative, the action not to abort and lionize the child whitethorn be regarded as a universal law and may be imposed upon any other individual who bring outs himself/ herself in such a situation.They may do without abortion as the same is in residence with their duty to preserve life because there are other heart by which they may still comply with their duty to Angela to protect and protection her life. One of these is by qualification sure that she is given the best possible attention during the surgery. It mustiness be state that Angelas is bound to live for only a few days, no proceeds what the doctors do.The course of action is further affirmed and clarified as it is su bjected to the second formulation. From such maxim arises the duty that human life must be protected and safeguarded because it must not be treated just as a factor unless always at the same time as an end.Ideally, the best course of action is to try all bureau possible and needed to safeguard both Angela and her babys life. However, it must be noted that Angelas life is already on the losing end and no consequence what the doctors do, she was bound to die sooner rather than later. Thus, aborting the baby is but a means to making sure that Angela will live albeit for a few a days with this fact, such course of action does not passageway the second formulation of the categorical imperative. The life of the baby must be treated not just as a means but also as an end.Thus, in this case the doctors of George Washington Hospital undertook to perform the best course of action given the situation as at the end of the day, life or death is not a decision that any person can make. For that matter, no one person can ever make that decision for someone else.Scenario 4The primary issue in this scenario was whether or not it would be ethical for the Dr. Wendy Smith to state poops father that he will die unless he gets a liver transplant.The issue arises from the fact that cakehole believes that his fathers situation will worsen once the gravity of his predicament is made cognise to him. On the other hand, Dr. Wendy Smith believes by his sworn duty to inform the patient of what he is up against.In this situation there is a jolt of duties between the duty of Jack to his father, as a son and the duty of the doctor to Jacks father as his doctor. It is the duty of Jack to do everything in his power to make sure that the best interests of his father is upheld and taken care of. On the other hand, in addition to the above-mentioned duties of a doctor to practice and prescribe to the best of my ability for the exhaustively of my patients, and to try to avoid harming the m and never to do deliberate harm to anyone for anyone elses interest, it is also their duty to keep the good of the patient as the highest priority.We shall now find out the resolve of the conflicting duties by subjecting them to the two formulations of the categorical imperative.With mention to Jacks duty, it is true that the upholding the best interests of ones advert can be willed that it should become a universal law. In addition, by upholding the best interests of ones parent, one acts in such a way that he/she treats humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any another, never simply as a means but always at the same time as an end.With valuate to Dr. Wendy Smiths duties to practice and prescribe to the best of my ability for the good of my patients, and to try to avoid harming them, never to do deliberate harm to anyone for anyone elses interest, and to keep the good of the patient as the highest priority. The same can be willed that they can become univers al laws and the same are also means by which humanity is treated not just as a means but also as an end.Thus, as both were subjected to the categorical imperative and both passed the formulations, what then? It can be noted that Jacks duty is to make sure that the best interests of his father are upheld, but how does Jack know what his best interests are? Is concealing the truth to him of his best interest? Thus, we subject this to the categorical imperative.Concealing the truth cannot be willed to become a universal law. If the same were to be allowed to become universal law then all concealments of truth in all situations not related to the situation at hand will be justified. The same is inconsistent to upholding the virtuousness of truth. At the same time, concealing the truth is actually a mode by which one is treated as a means and not as end. This is so as concealment provides a myopic cerebration it is a mere means for the people around Jacks father to avoid the issue of his impending demise for themselves rather than making sure that Jacks father is apprised of his situation and is prepared for the scourge possible ending of his situation.Thus, the best course of action to take is the action backed up by Dr. Wendy Smiths duty as a doctor to inform the patient of his predicament no matter how grave said situation is.